Heading
into 2017, Wall Street was excited by the prospect of a U.S. president who
sympathized completely with business. His
promised tax and healthcare reforms were widely cheered by investors in the
wake of his election. Yet the Congress
has so far failed to deliver on those promises and investors are no longer
giving the Trump administration a free pass based on the assumption that tax
breaks are on the way.
This
loss of enthusiasm is reflected in the long periods of dullness the market has
experienced since March. While the bull
market leg which began with the November election remains intact, the market
has proceeded in a halting fashion and has gradually lost some of its erstwhile
momentum. The following graph illustrates
this principle.
Along
these lines, a number of Wall Street economists have expressed the belief that
if Trump’s promised reforms fail to materialize, the stock market’s current
valuation precludes a continuation of the bull market. There are a number of reasons why this
statement is likely false, however, not the least of which is that the market
doesn’t need a political excuse to rally.
Indeed, if that were the case then China’s equity market, in view of the
country’s Communist government, would forever be stuck in neutral. The pace of innovation and productivity in
countries with a market-driven economy is consistently high enough to always
provide some justification for higher valuations and stock prices, regardless
of the political climate.
Writing
nearly 200 years ago, Alexis de Tocqueville observed that in America no matter
how much the tax burden increased, American ingenuity and resourcefulness
always found a way to counteract its malignant effect. He stated:
“It
is certain that despotism ruins individuals by preventing them from producing
wealth, much more than by depriving them of the wealth they have produced; it
dries up the source of riches, whilst it usually respects acquired property. Freedom, on the contrary, engenders far more
benefits than it destroys; and the nations which are favored by free
institutions invariably find that their resources increase even more rapidly
than their taxes.” [Democracy in America]
Tocqueville
understood that America is unique among the nations in that its people and
commercial spirit are strong enough to countervail even the most strenuous
attempts by politicians at slowing commercial progress. This principle is as true today as it was
then, perhaps even more so.
While
many analysts are concerned by currently high market valuation indicators, the
reality is that valuations can climb considerably higher before the market is
in imminent danger of a bear market. The
S&P 500 P/E ratio may be high at 26.13 by historical standards, it’s still
a ways from those high levels in the late 1990’s/early 2000’s which preceded
the death of the powerful ‘90’s bull market.
Moreover, price/earnings alone isn’t a reliable measure of how
undervalued or overvalued a market is.
One must also take into account the investor sentiment backdrop, levels
of participation among retail investors, and other technical and monetary
policy factors when forming a final determination as to whether or not the
market is truly “overvalued.”
To
illustrate how important it is to consider investor sentiment along with
valuation, I reprint here the words of William Jiler, who wrote investment
books in the 1960s. Using International
Business Machines (IBM) as an example, he wrote:
“How
could [an investor] anticipate that IBM would sell as low as 12 times its
annual profit in the late Nineteen Forties and at 60 times earnings in the late
Fifties? Obviously, ‘investor
confidence’ went up sharply in the Fifties.
And obviously, the psychology of the market – that is, the sum of the
attitudes of all potential buyers and sellers – is a crucial factor for
determining prices.” [How Charts Can Help You in the Stock Market]
The
main consideration for stocks going forward is the level of participation among
individual investors. With investor
sentiment still neutral and few small investors actively trading, the bull
market still has plenty of room to run.
The informed investors who are keeping the bull market alive need
someone to sell to when it finally comes time for them to unload their
holdings. That someone is the uninformed
public which by and large has been afraid of owning stocks since the 2008
credit crash. Until they rediscover the
“joys of investing” the 8-year-old bull market will continue to age, all the
while maintaining its vigor.
History
teaches that following a major financial crisis, a bull market lasting from
around 20 to 30 years normally follows.
Such was the case following the Great Crash and Depression of the 1930s,
the economic and political turmoil of the early 1970s, and in other eras in
U.S. market history. The last crisis in
2008-09 witnessed the birth of a new secular bull market which is already eight
years old. A generation is around 20-30
years, which partly explains why bull market typically last so long until the
next great crash; it takes that long for the generation that experienced the
last crisis to be replaced by an entirely new one which doesn’t remember
it. It’s only when the new generation
has come of age that the mistakes which led to the previous crisis are repeated
and the cycle begins anew.
Given
that the current generation is still, nearly 10 years later, still averse to
stocks to a large extent, the secular bull market has probably another 10-20
years to run before encountering the problems which always prove fatal to
it. I’m referring of course to the
dangers of over-participation and excess enthusiasm. Those dangers are nowhere in sight
today. We can therefore assume that the
long-term bull market still has many more years to run before eventually
reaching its terminus.
No comments:
Post a Comment